“From time to time educational leaders contemplate starting a new kind of educational program to
prepare science students to
debate the issues in public. Such a program would be a disaster for the Darwinists if it ever got off the ground because you can’t teach students
to argue a case
competently without familiarizing them with the best arguments on the other side. To refute
Michael Behe and William Dembski
the students would have to
study their books, and in the process they would learn about irreducible complexity and the nature
of complex specified genetic
information.”